Cupboard Workplace confronted prison probe over blocked Spycatcher paperwork | Freedom of data

Peter Wright at Hobart Airport in October 1987

A prison investigation workforce on the freedom of data watchdog has examined a grievance in opposition to the Cupboard Workplace, after it blocked the discharge of recordsdata in regards to the intelligence agent Peter Wright and the Spycatcher affair.

Tim Tate, a documentary-maker and creator, complained to the Data Commissioner’s Workplace (ICO) final June that the Cupboard Workplace had repeatedly given inaccurate info to justify withholding the recordsdata after he had requested their launch.

Wright, a former MI5 officer, claimed in his 1987 autobiography, Spycatcher, that the safety company had bugged embassies, and {that a} small group of brokers had plotted in opposition to the then prime minister Harold Wilson. MI5 carried out its personal inquiry and mentioned it discovered no proof of a conspiracy in opposition to Wilson.

Peter Wright at Hobart Airport in October 1987
Peter Wright at Hobart Airport in October 1987. The federal government misplaced its battle to cease his memoirs being printed in Australia. {Photograph}: Fairfax Media Archives/Fairfax Media/Getty Pictures

Wright died aged 78 in 1995. The recordsdata requested by Tate element the controversy across the disclosures and the federal government’s try and quash publication of his e book.

Cupboard Workplace officers initially turned down Tate’s request, saying the recordsdata have been being ready for switch to the Nationwide Archives and any disclosure to him may disrupt this work. They later advised Tate and the ICO that that they had refused the request on the grounds that the recordsdata have been exempt from disclosure as a result of they have been provided by or associated to the intelligence providers. Tate has since been advised the data he’s in search of would now “fall due for assessment and attainable switch in 2029”.

The ICO advised Tate final month that it had requested its prison investigations workforce to conduct a assessment of his grievance. The correspondence from a case officer states: “The commissioner by no means considers that the inconsistent and contradictory statements made by the Cupboard Workplace on this matter have been passable or not a trigger for concern.”

However the assessment concluded that whereas there was “a scarcity of readability and modifications of explanations” from Cupboard Workplace officers, the authorized justification for withholding the recordsdata was sound.

Tate’s complaints over the Cupboard Workplace’s dealing with of the Spycatcher recordsdata is the most recent criticism over its remedy of requests. A report by the Commons public administration and constitutional affairs committee in April final 12 months recognized poor dealing with of freedom of data circumstances throughout authorities. It additionally criticised the Cupboard Workplace over a scarcity of transparency of its operation of a “clearing home”, which coordinates responses to sure requests.

Tate first requested for the Spycatcher recordsdata in April 2019. He mentioned the Cupboard Workplace wasted public funds by delaying the discharge of recordsdata and giving deceptive info.

skip past newsletter promotion

Tate mentioned: “I’ve been attempting to get this info for nearly 4 years. The recordsdata are virtually 40 years outdated and by regulation they need to be within the public area.” He mentioned he had complained to the ICO due to inaccurate and deceptive info supplied throughout his request.

The federal government launched authorized proceedings to cease Spycatcher being printed in Australia, however misplaced the motion in 1987. The controversy over Wright’s disclosures and the makes an attempt by Margaret Thatcher’s authorities to forestall publication are detailed in 32 recordsdata containing authorities paperwork from 1986 and 1987.

The Cupboard Workplace has denied that any deceptive info was supplied by officers through the course of. It mentioned it complied with all freedom of data laws when coping with requests.

An ICO spokesperson mentioned that any allegations raised involving potential prison offences are routinely handed to its prison investigation workforce for a assessment. The spokesperson mentioned: “We concluded swiftly on this case that there was inadequate proof of any such offence.”